Buckner

Phillips v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.

Good Law
497 F.3d 1005·37 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20211·2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19291
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 14, 200705-35648, 05-35651, 05-35678, 05-35866, 05-35892, 05-35895, 06-35165California12,010 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schroeder, J.

7. Introduction.

The origins of this case trace back more than sixty years to the height of World War II when the federal government solicited Appellants E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., General Electric, Inc., UNC Nuclear Industries, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Co., and Rockwell International Corp., (collectively “Defendants”) to operate the Han-ford Nuclear Weapons Reservation (“Han-ford”) in southeastern Washington. The Hanford Reservation was a plutonium-production facility that helped make the atomic bomb that dropped on Nagasaki, Japan in World War II.

A regrettable Hanford byproduct was the radioiodine emitted into the surrounding area. The plaintiffs in this litigation are over two thousand residents who now claim that these emissions, known as I-131, caused various cancers and other life-threatening diseases. The first group of plaintiffs filed a complaint in 1990 under the federal statute governing nuclear accidents, the Price-Anderson Act (“PAA”), claiming they were entitled to damages for injuries arising from a nuclear incident pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2210 . The history is discussed in our earlier opinions in In re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation, 292 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.