Shroyer

Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Service

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 200706-55964California8,965 words

Opinion

Opinion

REINHARDT, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENNITH SHROYER, individually and  as Representative for all others similarly situated and the General Public, No. 06-55964 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No.

CV-06-01792-R

NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, OPINION

INC., a Delaware corporation;

AT&T CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 13, 2007* Pasadena, California

Filed August 17, 2007

Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Stephen Reinhardt, and Pamela Ann Rymer, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Reinhardt; Concurrence by Judge Rymer

*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

9993 9996 SHROYER v. NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS

COUNSEL

William Weinstein, Wechsler Harwood LLP, New York, New York, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Robert K. Friedl, Kirtland & Packard LLP, El Segundo, Cali- fornia, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Donald M. Falk, Mayer, Brown, Rowe…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.