Hulteen

Hulteen v. At&t Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 200704-16087California17,344 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOREEN HULTEEN; ELEANORA 

COLLET; LINDA PORTER; ELIZABETH

SNYDER; COMMUNICATIONS No. 04-16087

WORKERS OF AMERICA,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,  D.C. No.

CV-01-01122-MJJ

v. OPINION

AT&T CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Martin J. Jenkins, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted En Banc October 4, 2006—San Francisco, California

Filed August 17, 2007

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Circuit Judge, Stephen Reinhardt, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Pamela Ann Rymer, Michael Daly Hawkins, Susan P. Graber, M. Margaret McKeown, Kim McLane Wardlaw, William A. Fletcher, Raymond C. Fisher, Ronald M. Gould, Richard A. Paez, Marsha S. Berzon, Jay S. Bybee, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Wardlaw; Dissent by Judge O’Scannlain

10025 10028 HULTEEN v. AT&T CORPORATION

COUNSEL

Joseph R. Guerra, Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, Washing- ton, District of Columbia, for the defendant-appellant.

Henry S. Hewitt, Erickson, Beasley, Hewitt &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.