Hulteen
Hulteen v. At&t Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 200704-16087California17,344 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOREEN HULTEEN; ELEANORA
COLLET; LINDA PORTER; ELIZABETH
SNYDER; COMMUNICATIONS No. 04-16087
WORKERS OF AMERICA,
Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No.
CV-01-01122-MJJ
v. OPINION
AT&T CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Martin J. Jenkins, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted En Banc October 4, 2006—San Francisco, California
Filed August 17, 2007
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Circuit Judge, Stephen Reinhardt, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Pamela Ann Rymer, Michael Daly Hawkins, Susan P. Graber, M. Margaret McKeown, Kim McLane Wardlaw, William A. Fletcher, Raymond C. Fisher, Ronald M. Gould, Richard A. Paez, Marsha S. Berzon, Jay S. Bybee, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Wardlaw; Dissent by Judge O’Scannlain
10025 10028 HULTEEN v. AT&T CORPORATION
COUNSEL
Joseph R. Guerra, Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, Washing- ton, District of Columbia, for the defendant-appellant.