Gonzeles

Garcia Gomez v. Gonzeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 200706-70941California533 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FELIPE GARCIA GOMEZ; CIRA NILA 

HERRERA, No. 06-70941 Petitioner, Agency Nos. v.  A95-443-614 ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney A95-443-615 General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 13, 2007* San Francisco, California

Filed August 21, 2007

Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Michael Daly Hawkins, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

10195 GOMEZ v. GONZALES 10197

COUNSEL

Susan E. Hill, Hill, Piibe & Villegas, Los Angeles, California, for the petitioners.

Peter D. Keisler, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, and Andrew B. Insenga, Office of Immigration Litigation, Department of Jus- tice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Felipe Garcia Gomez and Cira Nila-Herrera (“the Gar- cias”), natives and citizens of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.