Ferc
Port of Seattle v. Ferc
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 200703-74139California10,370 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PORT OF SEATTLE, WASHINGTON,
Petitioner,
IDACORP ENERGY; WILLIAMS POWER
COMPANY INC.; CITY OF TACOMA,
WASHINGTON; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON COMPANY; CONSTELLATION
POWER SOURCE INC.; EL PASO
MERCHANT ENERGY L.P.; MORGAN
STANLEY CAPITAL GROUP, INC.;
TRACTEBEL ENERGY MARKETING
INC.; BP ENERGY CO.,
Intervenors, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY No. 03-74139 COMMISSION, FERC No. Respondent, Federal Power Act
M-S-R PUBLIC POWER AGENCY;
DUKE ENERGY TRADING AND
MARKETING, LLC; PUGET SOUND
ENERGY; CITY OF LOS ANGELES
DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND
POWER; SEMPRA ENERGY TRADING
CORP.; ENERGY PLUS LLC;
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER
AGENCY,
Intervenors,
PORT OF SEATTLE,
Applicant-Intervenor.
10395 10396 PORT OF SEATTLE v. FERC
CITY OF SEATTLE,
Petitioner,
IDACORP ENERGY L.P.;
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA; PORT OF SEATTLE;
DUKE ENERGY NORTH AMERICA,
LLC, DUKE ENERGY TRADING AND
MARKETING, LLC, (COLLECTIVELY,
“DUKE ENERGY”); CITY OF TACOMA, Intervenors,