Ferc

Port of Seattle v. Ferc

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 200703-74139California10,370 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PORT OF SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, 

Petitioner,

IDACORP ENERGY; WILLIAMS POWER

COMPANY INC.; CITY OF TACOMA,

WASHINGTON; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

EDISON COMPANY; CONSTELLATION

POWER SOURCE INC.; EL PASO

MERCHANT ENERGY L.P.; MORGAN

STANLEY CAPITAL GROUP, INC.;

TRACTEBEL ENERGY MARKETING

INC.; BP ENERGY CO.,

Intervenors, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY No. 03-74139 COMMISSION,  FERC No. Respondent, Federal Power Act

M-S-R PUBLIC POWER AGENCY;

DUKE ENERGY TRADING AND

MARKETING, LLC; PUGET SOUND

ENERGY; CITY OF LOS ANGELES

DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND

POWER; SEMPRA ENERGY TRADING

CORP.; ENERGY PLUS LLC;

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER

AGENCY,

Intervenors,

PORT OF SEATTLE,

Applicant-Intervenor. 

10395 10396 PORT OF SEATTLE v. FERC

CITY OF SEATTLE, 

Petitioner,

IDACORP ENERGY L.P.;

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA; PORT OF SEATTLE;

DUKE ENERGY NORTH AMERICA,

LLC, DUKE ENERGY TRADING AND

MARKETING, LLC, (COLLECTIVELY,

“DUKE ENERGY”); CITY OF TACOMA, Intervenors,

BENTON COUNTY, FRANKLIN

COUNTY, GRANT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.