Lopez

United States v. Lopez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 200705-50433California4,362 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On September 17, 2004, Lopez entered the United States and was arrested by a United States Border Patrol Senior Patrol Agent and transported to a Border Patrol Station, where 10760 UNITED STATES v. LOPEZ he was processed. Subsequently, Lopez was indicted for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of

U.S.C. § 1326.

At trial, Lopez took the stand and asserted a duress defense. Lopez testified that he entered the United States, hoping to get arrested and avoid being harmed by a drug dealer. During cross-examination, Lopez was questioned about whether he related the harm that he faced to any of the various people with whom he came into contact before he was transported to the Border Patrol Station. Lopez admitted that he did not tell anyone about the threats. The prosecutor also questioned Lopez about what he told the agents at the Border Patrol Sta- tion, where Lopez was processed and given his constitution- ally mandated Miranda warning by Agent Michael Harrington (Harrington). The relevant portion of the line of questioning began as follows:

Q. You never told any of the border patrol agents about any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.