Sherman

Sherman v. U.S. Parole Commission

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 200705-35364California9,023 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brunetti, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRENT SHERMAN, 

Petitioner-Appellant, v. No. 05-35364 UNITED STATES PAROLE  D.C. No.

CV-05-00008-JAR

COMMISSION; ROBERT A. HOOD,

Warden; CHARLES A. DANIELS, OPINION Warden, Respondents-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon James A. Redden, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 9, 2006—Portland, Oregon,

Filed September 4, 2007

Before: Melvin Brunetti, Thomas G. Nelson, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Brunetti

11253 11256 SHERMAN v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION

COUNSEL

Christine Stebbins Dahl, Assistant Federal Defender, Port- land, Oregon, for the petitioner-appellant.

Kenneth C. Bauman (brief), Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, Oregon; and Kelly A. Zusman (argued), Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, Oregon, for the respondents-appellees.

OPINION

BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:

We consider whether an administrative warrant issued pur- suant to 18 U.S.C. § 4213(a) for the retaking of an alleged parole violator is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.