Navarro-Lopez

Navarro-Lopez v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 200704-70345California12,783 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Navarro-Lopez is a native and citizen of Mexico. He is married to a U.S. citizen and has applied for permanent resi- dency through his wife. He has two U.S. citizen children, ages thirteen and sixteen, and a twenty-four-year-old child who is a legal permanent resident. He has been working in the United States for over twenty years, and he and his wife own their own home.

Navarro-Lopez entered the United States in June 1984. On August 9, 1999, Navarro-Lopez pled guilty to one count of California Penal Code section 32, accessory after the fact. He was sentenced to 270 days in jail and three years probation. In February 2001, Navarro-Lopez traveled to Tijuana, Mexico to visit his mother who was gravely ill. On February 11, 2001, Navarro-Lopez tried to re-enter the United States at the San Ysidro point of entry. When he presented his employment authorization card, the border patrol denied him entry and detained him. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”)2 thereafter commenced removal proceedings.

The INS charged Navarro-Lopez with being inadmissible because he did not have valid entry documents under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) and because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.