Menken
Menken v. Emm
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 200705-16467California5,989 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID MENKEN,
Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 05-16467 GERRY F. EMM and MAXINE C. D.C. No.
EMM; COLDWELL BANKER ITILDO, CV-04-0598-PHX-
INC.; MARSHA L. TOMERLIN and MHM
JOHN DOE TOMERLIN; DAVID J.
OPINION
MORANDI and JANE DOE MORANDI;
SCARPELLO, HUSS & OSHINSKI, LTD.,
Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Mary H. Murguia, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 12, 2007—San Francisco, California
Filed September 19, 2007
Before: Jay S. Bybee and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges, and J. Michael Seabright,* District Judge.
Opinion by Judge Seabright; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Bybee
*The Honorable J. Michael Seabright, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.
12629 MENKEN v. EMM 12633
COUNSEL
John Derrick, Law Office of John Derrick, Santa Barbara, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.