Yetiv

Yetiv v. Hud

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 200704-76044California2,028 words

Opinion

Opinion

Background

The Park on Westview property (“the property”) is a 212- unit multi-family housing project in Houston, Texas. Yetiv purchased the property in 1997 with a HUD-insured loan. To secure HUD insurance, Yetiv was required to sign a regula- tory agreement which imposed various duties related to the management and financial operations of the property, includ- ing the duty to submit annual financial statements. As a multi- family mortgagor, Yetiv was additionally subject to the Civil Money Penalty statute, 12 U.S.C. § 1735f-15, which autho- rizes HUD to impose civil penalties against mortgagors who “knowingly and materially” commit certain enumerated viola- tions. § 1735f-15(b)(1). One of the violations for which civil YETIV v. HUD 12799 penalties may be imposed is the failure to provide HUD with annual audited financial statements. See § 1735f- 15(c)(1)(B)(x).

After Yetiv failed to file financial statements for the five fiscal years spanning 1997-2001, HUD issued an administra- tive complaint in July 2002 seeking civil penalties pursuant to the Civil Monetary Penalty statute. Five months later, prior to an adjudication on the merits, Yetiv prepaid…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.