Ramadan

Ramadan v. Keisler

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 200703-74351California2,889 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NEAMA EL SAYED RAMADAN; 

GASSER HISHAM EL GENDY, No. 03-74351 Petitioners, Agency Nos. v.  A79-561-874 PETER D. KEISLER,* Acting A79-561-875 Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.  Filed September 28, 2007

Before: Harry Pregerson, Michael Daly Hawkins, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.

Order; Dissent by Judge O’Scannlain

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the case en banc. However, the en banc call failed to receive a majority of votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consider- ation. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

*Peter D. Keisler is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gon- zales, as Acting Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).

13329 13330 RAMADAN v. KEISLER The petitions for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.