Robert J. Jarvis v. L. S. Nelson

Jarvis appeals from an order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . The district court accepted the factual determination of the California state courts that Jarvis validly waived his constitutional right to remain silent, after the proper warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 1966, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 , had been given by the interrogating officers, and that the statements given by Jarvis thereafter were voluntarily made and properly admitted into evi dence at his trial for robbery and assaulting a police officer. People v. Jarvis, 1969, 276 Cal.App.2d 446 , 80 Cal. Rptr. 832 .

A federal court may rely in a habeas corpus proceeding on the state court’s factual determinations under certain conditions established by 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d). Relying on that statute, the court below found:

We agree.

Jarvis’ other contention does not raise a federal question.

Affirmed.