Bpa
Public Utility Distict v. Bpa
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 11, 200704-74240California5,223 words
Opinion
Opinion
Bybee PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. BONNEVILLE POWER 13763, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF
SNOHOMISH COUNTY WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON,
Petitioner,
THE WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
(WUTC); PORTLAND GENERAL
ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Intervenors, No. 04-74240 v. BPA No. BONNEVILLE POWER Power Act
ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent,
AVISTA CORPORATION; IDAHO POWER
COMPANY; PACIFICORP; PORTLAND
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY AND
PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC.,
Applicant-Intervenor.
13759 13760 PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. BONNEVILLE POWER
CANBY UTILITY BOARD,
Petitioner,
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICTS OF
CLALLAM, GRAYS HARBOR, AND
KITTITAS COUNTIES; PUBLIC UTILITY
DISTRICTS NO. 1 AND 3 OF MASON
COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
Intervenors, No. 04-74245 v. BPA No.
BONNEVILLE POWER 00PB-12157
ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent,
AVISTA CORPORATION; PACIFICORP;
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY; PUGET SOUND ENERGY,
Intervenors.
ALCOA, INC.,
Petitioner, No. 04-74252 v. BPA No.