Bpa

Public Utility Distict v. Bpa

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 11, 200704-74240California5,223 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bybee PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. BONNEVILLE POWER 13763, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF 

SNOHOMISH COUNTY WASHINGTON

WASHINGTON,

Petitioner,

THE WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

(WUTC); PORTLAND GENERAL

ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Intervenors, No. 04-74240 v.  BPA No. BONNEVILLE POWER Power Act

ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent,

AVISTA CORPORATION; IDAHO POWER

COMPANY; PACIFICORP; PORTLAND

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY AND

PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC.,

Applicant-Intervenor. 

13759 13760 PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. BONNEVILLE POWER

CANBY UTILITY BOARD, 

Petitioner,

PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICTS OF

CLALLAM, GRAYS HARBOR, AND

KITTITAS COUNTIES; PUBLIC UTILITY

DISTRICTS NO. 1 AND 3 OF MASON

COUNTY, WASHINGTON,

Intervenors, No. 04-74245 v.  BPA No.

BONNEVILLE POWER 00PB-12157

ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent,

AVISTA CORPORATION; PACIFICORP;

PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY; PUGET SOUND ENERGY,

Intervenors. 

ALCOA, INC., 

Petitioner, No. 04-74252 v.  BPA No.

FY…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.