Fair Housing Council v. roommates.com, LLC.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 12, 200704-56916California198 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN 

FERNANDO VALLEY; THE FAIR

HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN DIEGO,

individually and on behalf of the No. 04-56916

GENERAL PUBLIC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,  D.C. No.

CV-03-09386-PA

v.

ROOMMATES.COM, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee. 

FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN 

FERNANDO VALLEY; THE FAIR

HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN DIEGO,

No. 04-57173 individually and on behalf of the

GENERAL PUBLIC,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,  D.C. No.

CV-03-09386-PA

v. ORDER

ROOMMATE.COM, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant.  Filed October 12, 2007

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

14073 14074 FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL v. ROOMMATES.COM

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three- judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1 Judge Pregerson is recused.

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.