Bockting

Bockting v. Bayer

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 12, 200702-15866California7,304 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARVIN HOWARD BOCKTING,  No. 02-15866 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v.  CV-98-00764-ECR

ROBERT BAYER, ORDER AND

Respondent-Appellee.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Edward C. Reed, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 13, 2007—San Francisco, California

Filed October 12, 2007

Before: J. Clifford Wallace, John T. Noonan, and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Wallace; Dissent by Judge Noonan

13811 13814 BOCKTING v. BAYER

COUNSEL

Franny A. Forsman, Federal Public Defender, Las Vegas, Nevada, for petitioner Marvin Howard Bockting.

Victor-Hugo Schulze, II and Rene L. Hulse, Nevada State Attorney General’s Office, for respondent Robert Bayer.

ORDER

The opinion and dissent filed on September 27, 2007 are withdrawn. A new opinion and dissent are filed with this order.

OPINION

WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:

Bockting appeals from the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Bockting challenges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.