Saeteurn

United States v. Saeteurn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 200706-10401California4,355 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bea, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 06-10401 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-05-00033-DFL

KAE CHAI SAETEURN,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California David F. Levi, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 11, 2007—San Francisco, California

Filed October 15, 2007

Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, A. Wallace Tashima, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Bea

14003 UNITED STATES v. SAETEURN 14005

COUNSEL

Daniel J. Broderick, Federal Defender, Timothy Zindel, Assistant Federal Defender, Sacramento, California, for the defendant-appellant.

McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, Anne E. Pings, Kyle Riordan, Assistant United States Attorneys, Sacramento, California, for the plaintiff-appellee. 14006 UNITED STATES v. SAETEURN

OPINION

BEA, Circuit Judge:

This case deals with sentencing practice. Specifically, is the sentencing judge required to resolve disputes regarding facts recited in the Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”),1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.