Saeteurn
United States v. Saeteurn
Opinion
Opinion
Bea, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 06-10401 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No.
CR-05-00033-DFL
KAE CHAI SAETEURN,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California David F. Levi, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 11, 2007—San Francisco, California
Filed October 15, 2007
Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, A. Wallace Tashima, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Bea
14003 UNITED STATES v. SAETEURN 14005
COUNSEL
Daniel J. Broderick, Federal Defender, Timothy Zindel, Assistant Federal Defender, Sacramento, California, for the defendant-appellant.
McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, Anne E. Pings, Kyle Riordan, Assistant United States Attorneys, Sacramento, California, for the plaintiff-appellee. 14006 UNITED STATES v. SAETEURN
OPINION
BEA, Circuit Judge:
This case deals with sentencing practice. Specifically, is the sentencing judge required to resolve disputes regarding facts recited in the Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”),1…