Edward Jones v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 200704-55324California213 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD JONES; PATRICIA VINSON; 

GEORGE VINSON; THOMAS CASH;

No. 04-55324

STANLEY BARGER; ROBERT LEE

PURRIE, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, CV-03-01142-ER v.  Central District of California, CITY OF LOS ANGELES; WILLIAM Los Angeles BRATTON, Chief; CHARLES BECK,

ORDER

Captain, in their official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.  Filed October 15, 2007

Before: Pamela Ann Rymer and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and Edward C. Reed, Jr.,* District Judge.

ORDER

The parties have filed a joint motion informing us that they have settled this action and seeking dismissal of the appeal, remand and withdrawal of our opinion, reported at 444 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2006). Granting the motion in full, we dismiss this appeal as moot, vacate our opinion in Jones v. City of Los Angeles, 444 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2006), and remand the action to the district court for further proceedings consistent

*The Honorable Edward C. Reed, Jr., Senior United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.