Suntharalinkam

Suntharalinkam v. Keisler

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 17, 200704-70258California5,573 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARANGESAN SUNTHARALINKAM, 

Petitioner, No. 04-70258 v.  Agency No.

A79-784-825

PETER D. KEISLER,* Acting Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.  Filed October 18, 2007

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Stephen Reinhardt, Alex Kozinski, Pamela Ann Rymer, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Michael Daly Hawkins, Sidney R. Thomas, Barry G. Silverman, M. Margaret McKeown, Richard A. Paez, Marsha S. Berzon, Richard R. Clifton, Jay S. Bybee, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

Order; Dissent by Judge Kozinski

ORDER

The petitioner’s unopposed Motion to Withdraw his Peti- tion for Review is GRANTED. The government requests that dismissal be conditioned on vacatur of the panel opinion, which we agree is appropriate in the circumstances of this case. FRAP 42(b). The government also requests that the dis-

*Peter D. Keisler is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gon- zales, as Acting Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).

14075 14076 SUNTHARALINKAM v. KEISLER missal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.