Salcio

United States v. Salcio

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 200706-10546California2,482 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

In February 2005, Detective Ken Hedrick of the Stanislaus County Sheriff’s Department conducted an investigation into peer-to-peer file sharing of child pornography on the Internet. He utilized a program to locate files containing child pornog- raphy by searching for the term “babyj” and compared his search results with a list of known child pornography files. He then obtained a list of IP addresses that had those files avail- able for downloading. Upon finding a computer in California that had child pornography files available for sharing, Hedrick referred the information to the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement for additional investigation. The Bureau sent a summons to the Internet service provider to obtain subscriber information for the California computer. UNITED STATES v. SALCIDO 14123 Using the subscriber information, Special Agent Mike Prado obtained a search warrant for the address of the defen- dant, Salcido. When the search warrant was executed in Feb- ruary 2005, two computers and a CD-ROM were seized from the residence. At the time of the search, Salcido initially stated that he had not purposely obtained child pornography,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.