Medley

Medley v. Runnels

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 1, 200705-55295California9,123 words

Opinion

Opinion

Callahan Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Ikuta, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THEODORE BEECH MEDLEY,  No. 05-55295 Petitioner-Appellant, v.  D.C. No.

CV-03-01509-LGB

D. L. RUNNELS, Warden,

OPINION

Respondent-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Lourdes G. Baird, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 20, 2007—San Francisco, California

Filed November 1, 2007

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Stephen Reinhardt, Michael Daly Hawkins, Sidney R. Thomas, Barry G. Silverman, Kim McLane Wardlaw, Raymond C. Fisher, Ronald M. Gould, Richard A. Paez, Marsha S. Berzon, Richard C. Tallman, Richard R. Clifton, Jay S. Bybee, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Callahan Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Ikuta

14365 14368 MEDLEY v. RUNNELS

COUNSEL

Wayne Young, Santa Monica, California, for petitioner- appellant Theodore B. Medley.

Robert M. Foster, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, California, for respondent-appellee D. L. Runnels, Warden; Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.