California Pro-Life Council, Inc. v. Randolph

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 200705-15507California9,201 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

CPLC, a non-profit corporation under 26 U.S.C. § 501(c)(4), is a nonpartisan, nonsectarian, educational orga- nization dedicated to educating the public on abortion, infanti- cide, and euthanasia. CPLC is the state affiliate of the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), one of the nation’s most powerful lobbying and interests groups. According to CPLC, its major purpose is not the nomination or election of candidates or the passage or defeat of ballot measures, but rather to educate Californians regarding the value of life. In keeping with its expressed purpose, CPLC periodically generates mass mailings, ranging from 15,000 to in excess of 100,000 in number.

The purpose of the PRA is to inform voters of the identity of individuals and/or organizations who expend money in support of or in opposition to ballot measures. The informa- tion collected pursuant to PRA disclosure requirements is accessible to the public via the Secretary of State’s website. In 2004, there were 18,243,899 documented hits on this site, in 2005 11,118,821 documented hits, and in 2006 20,049,141 documented hits.

CPLC filed a ten-count amended verified complaint for declaratory and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.