Wah Chang v. Duke Energy Tradidng

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 200705-55367California4,298 words

Opinion

Opinion

FERNANDEZ, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WAH CHANG, a division of TDY  Industries, Inc., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 05-55367

DUKE ENERGY TRADING AND

MARKETING, LLC, a Delaware  D.C. No. limited liability company; RELIANT CV-04-01839-RHW ENERGY SERVICES INC., a Delaware corporation; TRANSALTA ENERGY MARKETING (CALIFORNIA), INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees. 

15087 15088 WAH CHANG v. DUKE ENERGY TRADING

WAH CHANG, a division of TDY  Industries, Inc., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AVISTA CORPORATION, a Washington corporation; AVISTA ENERGY, INC., a Washington corporation; AVISTA POWER LLC, a Washington limited liability company; DYNEGY POWER MARKETING, INC., a Texas corporation; EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY, a Texas corporation; IDACORP INC., an Idaho No. 05-55369 corporation; IDAHO POWER COMPANY, an Idaho corporation;  D.C. No.

CV-04-01840-RHW

IDACORP ENERGY, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership; OPINION

PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY, an Oregon corporation;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.