Soremekun
Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Adediji Soremekun was employed by Rite Aid as a phar- macist from approximately January 15, 1998, until his resig- nation on June 27, 2003.4 Soremekun’s employment at Rite Aid was governed by successive collective bargaining agree- ments (“CBAs”) between Rite Aid and the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (the “Union”).
A. Pay Provisions
Under the collective bargaining agreement for the period from July 5, 1999 to July 7, 2002 (the “1999-2002 CBA”),6 4 [Proposed] Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law (“Def.’s Facts”), ¶ 1; Plaintiff Adediji A. Soremekun’s Separate Statement of Disputed Material Facts (“Pl.’s Facts”), ¶ 1. 5 ‘Def.’s Facts, ¶ 2; Pl.’s Facts, ¶ 2. Plaintiff contends that he received a copy of the CBA only after he had filed a complaint with the Division of Labor Standards and Enforcement. (Pl.’s Facts, ¶ 2.) 6 Declaration of Glenn L. Briggs in Support of Defendant Thrifty Pay- less, Inc. d/b/a/ Rite Aid Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (“Briggs Decl.”), Exh. C at 47 (Retail Pharmacist Agreement between Rite Aid Inc. and UFCW Locals 135, 324, 770, 1036,…