MacIas-valencia

United States v. MacIas-valencia

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 200706-10711California2,006 words

Opinion

Opinion

Graber, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 06-10711 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-06-00010-RMW

SALVADOR MACIAS-VALENCIA,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 19, 2007* San Francisco, California

Filed December 5, 2007

Before: Robert R. Beezer, Stephen S. Trott, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Graber

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

15985 UNITED STATES v. MACIAS-VALENCIA 15987

COUNSEL

Rommel Bondoc, San Francisco, California, for the defendant-appellant.

John N. Glang, Assistant United States Attorney, San Jose, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

Does the mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years, pre- scribed by 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(viii), apply to a convic- tion for conspiracy with intent to distribute, and attempted possession with intent to distribute, 50 grams or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.