Crater
Crater v. Galaza
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDREW CORTEZ CRATER, No. 05-17027 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-01-01893-
GEORGE M. GALAZA, MCE/GGH
Eastern District Respondent-Appellee. of California, Sacramento
ORDER
Filed December 6, 2007
Before: Melvin Brunetti, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, and Stephen S. Trott, Circuit Judges.
Order; Dissent by Judge Reinhardt
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the case en banc. However, the en banc call failed to receive a majority of votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consider- ation. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied.
15995 15996 CRATER v. GALAZA REINHARDT, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges PREGERSON, GOULD, PAEZ, and BERZON join, dissent- ing from the denial of rehearing en banc: