National Labor Relations Board v. San Francisco Typographical Union No. 21, International Typographical Union, Afl-Cio, Roy O. Hoffman, Regional Director of the Twentieth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board v. San Francisco Typographical Union No. 21, International Typographical Union, Afl-Cio
Opinion
Opinion
465 F.2d 53 80 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3076 , 68 Lab.Cas. P 12,819 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SAN FRANCISCO TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION NO. 21, INTERNATIONAL TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION, AFL-CIO, et al., Respondents. Roy O. HOFFMAN, Regional Director of the Twentieth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Appellees, v. SAN FRANCISCO TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION NO. 21, INTERNATIONAL TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION, AFL-CIO, et al., Appellants. Nos. 71-1681, 26042. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 21, 1972. Duane B. Beeson (argued), of Brundage, Neyhart, Grodin & Beeson, Nathan R. Berke, of Severson, Werson, Berke & Melchior, George O. Bahrs, of Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon, San Francisco, Cal., for appellants. Warren Davidson, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel (argued), Marvin Roth, Supervisory Atty. (argued), Frank H. Itkin, Herbert Fishgold, Attys., Julius G. Serot, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., Roy O. Hoffman, Regional Director, NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees. Before CHAMBERS, TRASK and…