Shaw
SEC v. Shaw
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 200706-15204California3,333 words
Opinion
Opinion
Tallman, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 06-15204
INTERNET SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINESS
INC., D.C. No.
CV-01-00225-RLH
Defendant, OPINION and
LAWRENCE SHAW,
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Roger L. Hunt, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 8, 2007—San Francisco, California
Filed December 11, 2007
Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Richard C. Tallman, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Tallman
16295 SEC v. SHAW 16297
COUNSEL
David C. Amesbury (argued), Sandra L. Stewart, Amesbury & Schutt, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the appellant.
Brian G. Cartwright, Jacob B. Stillman, Susan S. McDonald (argued), Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., for the appellee.
OPINION
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Com- mission) filed a civil enforcement action against Lawrence Shaw. The SEC asserts it served Shaw through a British pro- 16298 …