Shaw

SEC v. Shaw

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 200706-15204California3,333 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tallman, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 06-15204

INTERNET SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINESS

INC.,  D.C. No.

CV-01-00225-RLH

Defendant, OPINION and

LAWRENCE SHAW,

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Roger L. Hunt, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 8, 2007—San Francisco, California

Filed December 11, 2007

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Richard C. Tallman, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Tallman

16295 SEC v. SHAW 16297

COUNSEL

David C. Amesbury (argued), Sandra L. Stewart, Amesbury & Schutt, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the appellant.

Brian G. Cartwright, Jacob B. Stillman, Susan S. McDonald (argued), Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., for the appellee.

OPINION

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Com- mission) filed a civil enforcement action against Lawrence Shaw. The SEC asserts it served Shaw through a British pro- 16298 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.