Biagon
United States v. Biagon
Opinion
Opinion
THOMAS, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 06-10479 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No.
CR-05-00238-JSW
AGOSTO AYSON BIAGON,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 18, 2007—San Francisco, California
Filed December 17, 2007
Before: David R. Thompson, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Thomas; Concurrence by Judge Kleinfeld
16437 UNITED STATES v. BIAGON 16439
COUNSEL
Claire M. Leary, San Francisco, California, for the appellant.
Jeffrey R. Finigan, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, for the appellee. 16440 UNITED STATES v. BIAGON
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we consider whether the district court vio- lated the defendant’s right of allocution when it denied a motion to close the courtroom for sentencing. We conclude that the defendant’s rights were not violated, and affirm the judgment of the district court.