Bulat

K and N Engineering v. Bulat

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 200706-55393California1,460 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ikuta, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

K AND N ENGINEERING, INC., a  California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 06-55393 SARAH BULAT, individually, d/b/a  D.C. No.

CV-04-09707-AHM

Incline Design, a/k/a Incdesign;

STEVEN DALE WANDEL, OPINION

individually, a/k/a Incdesign, d/b/a Incline Design, Defendants-Appellants.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California A. Howard Matz, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 24, 2007—Pasadena, California

Filed December 18, 2007

Before: Thomas G. Nelson, Sandra S. Ikuta, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Ikuta

16493 K AND N ENGINEERING v. BULAT 16495

COUNSEL

Ryan M. Fountain, Mishawaka, Indiana, for the defendants- appellants.

Sam M. Muriella, Attlesey, Thomlinson & Clark, LLP, Tus- tin, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

IKUTA, Circuit Judge:

In this case we are asked to decide whether an award of statutory damages for trademark counterfeiting under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c) precludes an award of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.