Bradley
Bradley v. Henry
Opinion
Opinion
NOONAN, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NICOLE BRADLEY, No. 04-15919 Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.C. No.
CV-03-03034-PJH
GLORIA HENRY, Warden,
OPINION
Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 19, 2007* San Francisco, California
Filed December 19, 2007
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Harry Pregerson, Warren J. Ferguson, John T. Noonan, Sidney R. Thomas, Barry G. Silverman, William A. Fletcher, Marsha S. Berzon, Richard C. Tallman, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Noonan; Concurrence by Judge Clifton; Dissent by Judge Silverman
*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
16503 16506 BRADLEY v. HENRY
COUNSEL
Dennis P. Riordan, San Francisco, California, for the petitioner-appellant.
Gregory A. Ott, Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, California, for the respondent-appellee.