Tahara

Tahara v. Matson Terminals

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 26, 200705-17306California2,727 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

QUENTIN H. TAHARA,  No. 05-17306 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v.  CV-04-00224-HG/

MATSON TERMINALS, INC., LEK

Defendant-Appellee.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Helen Gillmor, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 5, 2007* Honolulu, Hawaii

Filed December 27, 2007

Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, A. Wallace Tashima, and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

16761 16764 TAHARA v. MATSON TERMINALS, INC.

COUNSEL

Joshua T. Gillelan II, Longshore Claimants’ National Law Center, Washington, DC, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Michael J. Nakano, Frame Formby & O’Kane, Honolulu, Hawaii, for the defendant-appellee.

OPINION

MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant Quentin Tahara appeals the amount of attorney’s fees awarded to him by the district court under the TAHARA v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.