Davis

Davis v. Silva

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 200805-16821California2,533 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

Michael Davis is a California state prisoner serving a nine- year sentence for second degree burglary. While in prison, he allegedly committed a battery against a prison staff employee.1 1 The prison employee recounted the alleged assault this way: Inmate Davis . . . assigned in the Culinary as a Cart Maintenance, reported to work at approximately 0630 hours. I noticed Inmate DAVIS v. SILVA 27 A prison disciplinary hearing was convened. Davis was found guilty of battery of a staff member and was assessed a 150-day forfeiture of good-time credit. Davis filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the California Supreme Court, challenging the constitutionality of the forfeiture.

For purposes of this appeal, the relevant sections of Davis’ form petition state:

Petitioner was denied his due process rights under Wolff v. McDonnell, [1974] 418 U.S. 539 Penal Code Section 2932 subdivision [A][3] and Title 15, Cal. Admin, Code Section 3315[E] to have witness.

On or about 1-23-02 notice was received that the above petitioner violation of section 4501.5 of the Penal Code was accepted by the District Attorney Office in Case No SF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.