Orn

Orn v. Astrue

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 9, 200805-16181California2,176 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEO ORN,  No. 05-16181 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-F-04-05761-

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,*  DLB

Commissioner of Social Security, Eastern District of Defendant-Appellee. California, Fresno

 ORDER

Filed January 9, 2008

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Stephen S. Trott and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

On July 16, 2007, we issued an opinion reversing the Com- missioner of Social Security’s decision to deny Leo Orn social security disability benefits and remanded to the district court with instructions to remand to the Commissioner for calculation of benefits. Orn v. Astrue, 495 F.3d 625, 640 (9th Cir. 2007). Orn filed a timely application in this court under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA” or “the Act”) for attorney’s fees and costs incurred in pursuing his appeal. The Commissioner opposed Orn’s application, contending that this court does not have authority under the Act to award attorney’s fees and costs. We disagree with the Commis-…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.