Nasa

Nelson v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration

Bad Law
512 F.3d 1134·2008 WL 110465·26 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1793·2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 498
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 11, 200807-56424California4,863 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wardlaw, J.

The named appellants in this action (“Appellants”) are scientists, engineers, and administrative support personnel at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (“JPL”), a research laboratory run jointly by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) and the California Institute of Technology (“Caltech”). Appellants sued NASA, Caltech, and the Department of Commerce (collectively “Appellees”), challenging NASA’s recently adopted requirement that “low risk” contract employees like themselves submit to in-depth background investigations. The district court denied Appellants’ request for a preliminary injunction, finding they were unlikely to succeed on the merits and unable to demonstrate irreparable harm. Because Appellants raise serious legal and constitutional questions and because the balance of hardships tips sharply in their favor, we reverse and remand.

I

JPL is located on federally owned land, but operated entirely by Caltech pursuant to a contract with NASA. Like all JPL personnel, Appellants are employed by Caltech, not the government. Appellants are designated by the government as “low risk” contract employees. They do not work with classified material.

Appellants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.