Casteneda

United States v. Casteneda

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 200805-10372California1,835 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

On December 18, 2003, the government charged Medina- Casteneda, Marcos Garcia, Rolando Medina, and Manuel Lopez with drug trafficking offenses revealed during an undercover investigation. The investigation involved drug 534 UNITED STATES v. CASTENEDA purchases by undercover officers, coordinated police surveil- lance, and a search pursuant to a search warrant. The search yielded a bag of methamphetamine, two bags of rock cocaine, four bags of approximately 20-30 grams of cocaine base, guns, and plastic “kilo” wrappers and a coffee pot with cocaine residue. The district court denied both a motion to suppress evidence obtained in the search and a request for a Franks hearing.

The government proceeded to trial with Medina-Casteneda on the charges of (1) conspiracy to distribute and conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846; (2) possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); and (3) possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). A jury found Medina-Casteneda guilty of the first two counts. During…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.