Cerezo

Cerezo v. Mukasey

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 200805-74688California3,290 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ikuta CEREZO v. MUKASEY 415, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANGEL CEREZO, 

Petitioner, No. 05-74688 v.  Agency No.

A17-169-048

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. 

ANGEL CEREZO, 

Petitioner, No. 05-75213 v.  Agency No.

A17-169-048

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 4, 2007* Pasadena, California

Filed January 14, 2008

Before: Marsha S. Berzon and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges, and James K. Singleton,** Senior District Judge.

*The panel unanimously find this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). **The Honorable James K. Singleton, United States Senior District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.

413 414 CEREZO v. MUKASEY Opinion by Judge Ikuta CEREZO v. MUKASEY 415

COUNSEL

Lucas Guttentag, Monica M. Ramirez, ACLU Foundation Immigrants’ Rights Project, Oakland, California, and Peter J. Eliasberg, Ahilan…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.