Dible

Dible v. City of Chandler

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 200805-16577California9,331 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD DIBLE; MEGAN DIBLE,  No. 05-16577 husband and wife, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, CV-03-00249-JAT v. ORDER CITY OF CHANDLER, a municipality AMENDING in the State of Arizona; CHANDLER OPINION AND POLICE DEPARTMENT, a law CONCURRING enforcement agency of the City of  OPINION AND Chandler; BOBBY JOE HARRIS, DENYING Chandler Police Chief and APPELLANT’S husband; JUDY HARRIS, wife, PETITION FOR Defendants-Appellees. REHEARING AND

FOR REHEARING

EN BANC AND

AMENDED

 OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 11, 2007—San Francisco, California

Filed September 5, 2007 Amended February 1, 2008

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, William C. Canby, Jr., and Ferdinand F. Fernandez, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Fernandez; Concurrence by Judge Canby

1629 1632 DIBLE v. CITY OF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.