Dible
Dible v. City of Chandler
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 200805-16577California9,331 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RONALD DIBLE; MEGAN DIBLE, No. 05-16577 husband and wife, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, CV-03-00249-JAT v. ORDER CITY OF CHANDLER, a municipality AMENDING in the State of Arizona; CHANDLER OPINION AND POLICE DEPARTMENT, a law CONCURRING enforcement agency of the City of OPINION AND Chandler; BOBBY JOE HARRIS, DENYING Chandler Police Chief and APPELLANT’S husband; JUDY HARRIS, wife, PETITION FOR Defendants-Appellees. REHEARING AND
FOR REHEARING
EN BANC AND
AMENDED
OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 11, 2007—San Francisco, California
Filed September 5, 2007 Amended February 1, 2008
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, William C. Canby, Jr., and Ferdinand F. Fernandez, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Fernandez; Concurrence by Judge Canby
1629 1632 DIBLE v. CITY OF…