United States v. Murphy
Opinion
Opinion
Reinhardt, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 06-30582 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No.
CR-04-30057-ALA
STEPHEN WAYNE MURPHY,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted July 12, 2007—Portland, Oregon
Filed February 20, 2008
Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Stephen Reinhardt, and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Reinhardt
1519 1522 UNITED STATES v. MURPHY
COUNSEL
Vance M. Waliser, Medford, Oregon, for the defendant- appellant.
Karin J. Immergut, United States Attorney, District of Ore- gon, Judith R. Harper, Special Assistant United States Attor- ney, Medford, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellee. UNITED STATES v. MURPHY 1523
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Murphy appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of two searches. We conclude that one search was lawful and one was not. The first search, a protective sweep of storage units following Murphy’s…