Arrington

Arrington v. Charles Daniels

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 200806-35855California5,490 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt 1504 ARRINGTON v. DANIELS, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES ARRINGTON, 

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 06-35855 v.  D.C. No. CHARLES DANIELS, Warden CV-05-01352-HA Sheridan FCI; BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondents-Appellees. 

ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ, 

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 06-36092 v.  D.C. No. CHARLES DANIELS, Warden, CV-06-00317-ALH Respondent-Appellee. 

ANTWANE BURRISE, 

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 07-35013 v.  D.C. No. CHARLES DANIELS, Warden, CV-05-01872-HA Respondent-Appellee. 

1497 1498 ARRINGTON v. DANIELS

MICK WILLIAMS, 

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 07-35023 v.  D.C. No. CHARLES A. DANIELS, Warden; CV-05-01346-ALH

BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Respondents-Appellees. 

DOMINIQUE E. JIMERSON, 

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 07-35082 v.  D.C. No. CHARLES A. DANIELS, Warden; CV-05-01359-HA

BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Respondents-Appellees. 

RICHARD E. STURDEVANT, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.