Betz
Betz v. Trainer Wortham
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 200805-15704California9,062 words
Opinion
Opinion
Gould COUNSEL, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HEIDE BETZ, No. 05-15704 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-03-03231-SI
TRAINER WORTHAM & COMPANY, ORDER
INC.; DAVID P. COMO; FIRST AMENDING
REPUBLIC BANK, a Nevada OPINION AND corporation; ROBERT VILE, AMENDED Defendants-Appellees. OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Yvonne Illston, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 12, 2007—San Francisco, California
Filed October 4, 2007 Amended February 26, 2008
Before: John T. Noonan, Jr., Ronald M. Gould, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.
Order; Dissent to Order by Chief Judge Kozinski Opinion by Judge Gould COUNSEL
Joseph M. Alioto, San Francisco, California, Theodore F. Schwartz, St. Louis, Missouri, and Myron Moskovitz, Berke- ley, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.
Sara B. Brody and Alexander M.R. Lyon, Heller Ehrman, LLP, San Francisco, California, for the defendants-appellees. 1644 …