Lanier

Lanier v. City of Woodburn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 200806-35262California2,446 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rymer, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JANET LYNN LANIER, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 06-35262

CITY OF WOODBURN,

Defendant-Appellant,  D.C. No.

CV-04-01865-KI

and OPINION

LINDA SPRAUER,

Defendant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Garr M. King, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 6, 2008—Portland, Oregon

Filed March 13, 2008

Before: Pamela Ann Rymer and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges, and Cormac J. Carney,* District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Rymer

*The Honorable Cormac J. Carney, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

2445 2448 LANIER v. CITY OF WOODBURN

COUNSEL

Marjorie A. Speirs and Janet M. Schroer, Hoffman, Hart & Wagner, LLP, Portland, Oregon, for the defendant-appellant.

Steven M. Wilker and Paul W. Conable, Tonkon Torp, LLP, Portland, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

RYMER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to decide whether the City of Woodburn’s policy requiring candidates of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.