Marmolejo-Campos

Marmolejo-Campos v. Mukasey

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 200804-76644California114 words

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARMANDO MARMOLEJO-CAMPOS, aka  Campos Ramos Armando, No. 04-76644 Petitioner, v.  Agency No.

A71-616-204

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney

ORDER

General, Respondent.  Filed March 14, 2008

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

2591

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson/West.