Fernandez

Fernandez v. Mukasey

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 200806-74228California981 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PETER URRUTIA FERNANDEZ;  No. 06-74228 MARTHA AMPIL KATIGBAK, Agency Nos. Petitioners, A72-401-498 v. A72-516-414 MICHAEL B. MUKASEY,* Attorney ORDER General, AMENDING Respondent.  OPINION AND

DENYING

PETITION FOR

REHEARING AND

PETITION FOR

REHEARING EN

BANC AND

AMENDED

 OPINION

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted December 3, 2007—San Francisco, California

Filed January 7, 2008 Amended March 25, 2008

Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Marsha S. Berzon, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.

*Michael B. Mukasey is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).

2881 2882 FERNANDEZ v. MUKASEY Per Curiam Opinion FERNANDEZ v. MUKASEY 2883

COUNSEL

Martin Avila Robles, San Francisco, California, for the peti- tioners.

Don G. Scroggin, Department of Justice, Washington,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.