Dtsc, California v. Burlington Northern
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 200803-17125California24,034 words
Opinion
Opinion
Berzon, J.
Volume 1 of
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, and
DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES
CONTROL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 03-17125 v. D.C. Nos.
BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA
FE RAILWAY COMPANY, as CV-92-05068-OWW
CV-96-06226-OWW
successor in interest to the CV-96-06228-OWW Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company; UNION PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, as successor in interest to the Southern Pacific Transportation Company; SHELL OIL COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees.
2887 2888 DEP’T OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant, and
DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES
CONTROL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
Plaintiff, v. No. 03-17153
BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA
FE RAILWAY COMPANY, as D.C. No.
CV-92-05068-OWW
successor in interest to the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company; UNION PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, as successor in interest to the Southern Pacific Transportation Company; SHELL OIL COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees. DEP’T OF TOXIC…