Serrano Gutierrez v. Mukasey

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 200804-75650California2,035 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould COUNSEL, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FIDEL SERRANO GUTIERREZ; MARTHA 

CERVANTES; ALMA JANETH SERRANO

CERVANTES, No. 04-75650 Petitioners, Agency Nos. v.  A75-304-498

A75-304-499

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney A75-304-501 General, Respondent. 

FIDEL SERRANO GUTIERREZ; MARTHA 

CERVANTES; ALMA JANETH SERRANO No. 06-70551 CERVANTES, Agency Nos. Petitioners, v.  A75-304-498

A75-304-499

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney A75-304-501 General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted March 4, 2008—Pasadena, California

Filed April 2, 2008

Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Ronald M. Gould, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Gould COUNSEL

Simon Salinas and Carlos A. Cruz, Tustin, California, for the petitioners.

Stacy S. Paddack, Hillel R. Smith, and Jeffery R. Leist, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for respondent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.