United States v. Norberto Reveles-Espinoza

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 200805-50905California169 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-50905 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-05-00040-NAJ

NORBERTO REVELES-ESPINOZA, ORDER

Defendant-Appellant.  GRANTING

PETITION FOR

REHEARING AND

WITHDRAWING

MEMORANDUM

 DISPOSITION

Filed April 15, 2008

Before: Raymond C. Fisher and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges, and Raner C. Collins, District Judge.*

ORDER

Appellant’s petition for rehearing, filed November 2, 2007, is GRANTED. The memorandum disposition filed on Octo- ber 19, 2007, and appearing at 251 Fed. Appx. 455 (9th Cir. 2007) is withdrawn. The superseding per curiam opinion will be filed concurrently with this order. The parties may file an additional petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. All other pending motions are denied as moot.

*The Honorable Raner C. Collins, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

3969

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.