Staffeldt

United States v. Staffeldt

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 200805-10243California170 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 05-10243 v. D.C. No.

JEREMY EUGENE STAFFELDT;  CR-03-01294-ROS

District of Arizona,

ORLANDO LEON PASTRANO; LINCOLN

CLARENCE METZGAR; JOHN Phoenix

ANTHONY GONZALES, ORDER

Defendants-Appellees.  Filed April 22, 2008

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, John T. Noonan, and Michael Daly Hawkins, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The Government’s unopposed motion to amend the opinion is GRANTED. The opinion published at 451 F.3d 578 (9th Cir. 2006) is amended to delete all mentions of the name “Keith Vercauteren.” Accordingly, the phrase “In September 2003, Assistant United States Attorney Keith Vercauteren (“AUSA Vercauteren”) . . . ” shall be amended to read, “In September 2003, an Assistant United States Attorney (“the AUSA”) . . . ” All subsequent references to “AUSA Ver- cauteren” shall be amended to read, “the AUSA.”

4215

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.