Clark v. Time Warner

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 200807-55794California2,949 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

K. CLARK, both individually and as 

representative of the proposed class, No. 07-55794 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No.

CV-07-01797-VBF

TIME WARNER CABLE, a OPINION corporation, Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 6, 2008* Pasadena, California

Filed April 30, 2008

Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge O’Scannlain

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). COUNSEL

Stephen Yagman, Yagman & Yagman & Reichmann, Venice Beach, California, filed briefs for the plaintiff-appellant; Mar- ion R. Yagman and Joseph Reichmann, Yagman & Yagman & Reichmann, Venice Beach, California, were on the briefs.

Bryan A. Merryman, White & Case LLP, Los Angeles, Cali- fornia, filed a brief for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.