Martinez-Merino

Martinez-Merino v. Keisler

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 5, 200805-74776California1,852 words

Opinion

Opinion

Noonan, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANULFO MARTINEZ-MERINO,  No. 05-74776 Petitioner, Agency No. v.  A78-198-090 MICHAEL B. MUKASEY,* Attorney

ORDER AND

General,

OPINION

Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted August 8, 2007—Anchorage, Alaska

Filed May 5, 2008

Before: J. Clifford Wallace, John T. Noonan, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Noonan

*Michael B. Mukasey is substituted for his predecessor, Peter D. Keis- ler, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). COUNSEL

Phillip J. Eide, Anchorage, Alaska, for the petitioner.

Edward J. Duffy, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

ORDER

The opinion and concurrence filed October 10, 2007, are

WITHDRAWN.

OPINION

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

In this converted petition for review of the order reinstating his removal from the country, Ranulfo Martinez-Merino (Martinez) challenges the validity of his underlying removal proceedings. Holding that Martinez has not successfully alleged the deprivation of any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.