Michael Holtsinger v. Tonya Voros

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 201110-16076California457 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

CORRECTED August 9, 2011 + JUL 14 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

NOT FOR PUBLICATION U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL HOLTSINGER, No. 10-16076

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:03-cv-00732-MCE-

CMK

vs.

MEMORANDUM *

Tonya Voros; T. Nolan,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 16, 2011 ** San Francisco, California

Before: BYBEE and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David A. Ezra, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Hawaii, sitting by designation.+ California state prisoner Michael Holtsinger appeals the district court’s grant

of summary judgment in favor of Defendant T. Nolan on Holtsinger’s 42 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.